My third book, which I’m tentatively calling Public Facts (although I’ve also thought of abandoning all subtext and calling it something like Must the Discourse Be Bad?, or Why the Cultural Conversation is Lousy), is an investigation of the ways we arrive at consensus accounts of what happened so that we can democratically deliberate about it. Really “investigation” is the wrong word there. It’s more like “whistlestop tour.”
The 2 links in the 2d para seem to go to the same article..